Comparisons
The framework against its neighbours
Where Computational Theology has genuine intellectual kin, where it merely borrows a vocabulary for atmosphere, and what it actually imports from the science it cites.
The poster series moves fast across distinction logic, process metaphysics, negative theology, learning-cosmology, and theodicy. Each move has an established literature it is either continuing, simplifying, or decorating itself with. These pages situate the framework precisely against named thinkers, separate load-bearing borrowings from aesthetic ones, and hold the corpus to its own "analogy, not theorem" guardrail. The references page lists every external work the framework leans on, with a one-line note on whether it is used faithfully.
vs. Spencer-Brown & Hennix →
Distinction as primitive: real lineage from Laws of Form, or a borrowed mark?
vs. Whitehead & process philosophy →
Creatio continua and becoming-over-substance — how close is the family resemblance?
vs. apophatic theology & Madhyamaka →
"The framework kneels": is the humility move earned or a patch?
vs. the Autodidactic Universe →
What the series imports from arXiv:2104.03902 vs. what it mythologises.
vs. theodicy & process theology →
"Can God be just if nature is uncaring?" against the classical problem of evil.
References →
A verifiable bibliography of every external work the framework leans on.
Throughout, the primary material is the poster browser; panels are cited as "pt4 · panel 011" using the poster map numbering.